ext_121882 ([identity profile] random-walker.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] interstice 2010-11-19 07:08 am (UTC)

I like the concept of a proper scoring rule (note that quadratic loss is one). However how often is one interested in extracting a subjective probability? In this case the object of interest seems to be the outcome rather than the probability.

Overall I suspect that the loss function doesn't matter much - you either find the "structure" or not. However, it is a curiosity that in statistics, setting the model for structure (probability) leaves no freedom in modeling the loss (which is minus the loglikelihood). What happens if I want to fit a Poisson model, but I'm interested in minimizing predictive least square error? Is that impossible? Trivial? Meaningless? I'm not sure.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting